Incorporating Employment (Amendment) Act 2022
jQuery Carousel
Member Login

  User ID
  Password
 
Forgot Password
   

MEF Academy Events
 05[MSOSH] Occupational Safety and Health Coordinator Trained Person5 - 7 December 2023 (9:00 AM – 5:00 PM)
 06[JB] HR FOR BEGINNERS (English)6-7 December 2023 (9.00 AM – 5.00 PM)
 12[IT] Microsoft Excel Essential Skills (Level 1 & 2) 12-13 December 2023 (9.00 AM – 5.00 PM)
 12[IT] PowerPivot: Powerful Data Analysis and Data Modelling in Microsoft Excel 12-13 December 2023 (9.00 AM – 5.00 PM)
 14[Meridian Communications] How to Handle Journalists and the Tough & Tricky Media Questions, and Act Pre-emptively to Overcome Media Crises & Controversies14 December 2023 (9.00 AM – 5.30 PM)
 19[JB] MANAGING AND HANDLING PROBATIONERS19 December 2023 (9.00 AM – 5.00 PM)
 20[IT] Tasks Automation with Microsoft Excel Macro / VBA (Fundamental & Intermediate) 20-21 December 2023  (9.00 AM – 5.00 PM)
 20[AeU-MEFA] Master of Human Resource Management (MHRM) - January Intake 2024 January Intake 2024
 09[Face to Face] Harness the power of AI for HR9 – 10 January 2024 (9.00 AM – 5.00 PM)
 18[Face to Face] (MC) A Practical Guide for Human Resources Practitioners on SOCSO’s Legislation – Employees’ Social Security Act 1969 (Act 4) 18 January 2024 (9.00 AM – 5.00 PM)
 

Selected Industrial Court Awards
Search Industrial Court Awards
Company/Claimant/Tags          


Award No:32/2014
  
Company:Sapura Brake Technologies Sdn Bhd
  
Claimant:  Mawlud Mustain 
 
  
Case  
  
​The employee was employed by the company as Marketing Manager and he was transferred many times during his employment.
 
In March 2006, he was informed that he would be transferred to Sapura Industrial Berhad as Manager of Group Human Resources and Administration.
 
He responded by letter requesting that he be retained in the Marketing Department.
 
The company instructed that the employee report for work on June 7, 2006 but he failed to do so. The company then issued him a notice asking him to make payment in lieu of notice.
 
Issue:
 
1.  Whether the employee had been constructively dismissed?

2.  Whether the company’s action had amounted to a fundamental breach of the contract of employment?

3.  Whether the dismissal is with just cause and excuse?
 
The employee contended that he was constructively dismissed when he was transferred from the Marketing to the Human Resource and Administration Department.
 
The company contended that the employee abandoned his job. Even though the company’s right to transfer the employee was based on its discretion, there was no evidence that the company had victimized the employee by transferring him to other department.
 
 
  
Held   
  
​On the balance of probabilities, the employee failed to prove that the company had acted in a manner which resulted in a breakdown of the relationship of mutual trust and confidence between employer and employee. Evidence indicated that the company was still willing to keep the employee in employment.
 
The employee should not have walked out based on the assumption that the transfer was a breach of his contract of service.
 
Claim for constructive dismissal dismissed.
  
 
Tags/Keywords
constructive dismissal, transfer
  
/Side Banners/NMI_Mar2023.jpg
/Side Banners/PublicHoliday.jpg
/Side Banners/Membership-with-a-Click.jpg
/Side Banners/TalentCorp_170x55.jpg
/Side Banners/KWSP_170x104.jpg
/Side Banners/ace_170x153.jpg
/Side Banners/cape_170x50.jpg
/Side Banners/ioe_170x95.jpg
/Side Banners/ilo_170x90.jpg

   ©  Copyright 2023 Malaysian Employers Federation  |  All Rights Reserved.