Member Login

  User ID
  Password
 
Forgot Password
   

MEF Academy Events
 04[Sabah-Sarawak] HR & IR FOR BEGINNERS4-5 July 2024; 18-19 July 2024; 29-30 July 2024; 8-9 Aug 2024; 26-27 Aug 2024
 04BEHAVIORAL BASED INTERVIEWING SKILLS4-5 July 2024 (9.00 AM – 5.00 PM)
 06[ONLINE] HRD Corp Train the Trainer 6, 7, 13, 14, 20 July 2024 (9am – 5pm)
 08Business Communication Series: Online Presentation Skills 8 July 2024 (8.30 AM – 5.00 PM)
 09Business Communication Series: Presentation Skills (Intermediate Level) 9-10 July 2024 (8.30 AM – 5.00 PM)
 09[Peninsular] HR & IR FOR BEGINNERS9-10 July 2024; 22-23 July 2024; 12-13 Aug 2024 (8.30 AM – 5.00 PM)
 09[BATU PAHAT] HR FOR BEGINNERS9-10 July 2024 (9.00 AM – 5.00 PM)
 09[Face to Face] Harness the power of AI for HR 9-10 July 2024 (9.00 AM – 5.00 PM)
 10[IT] Power BI Desktop Essential Skills 10-11 July 2024 (9.00 AM – 5.00 PM)
 10[IT] Microsoft Excel Functions & Formulas 10-11 July 2024 (9.00 AM – 5.00 PM)
 10[PJ] UNDERSTANDING LABOUR LAWS 10-11 July 2024 (9.00 AM – 5.00 PM)
 11[Sibu] GET IT RIGHT - Mastering the Application of Labour Ordinance (Sarawak Chap. 76) & The Rules11-12 July 2024 (8.30 AM – 5.00 PM)
 

Selected Industrial Court Awards
Search Industrial Court Awards
Company/Claimant/Tags          


Award No:3/2014
  
Company:Misc Berhad
  
Claimant:  Zulhilmi Bin Fauzi 
 
  
Case  
  
​The employee was employed as a General Purpose Caterer and Clause 15 of his Letter of Appointment subjected him to random drug or alcohol test by the company.
In Dec 2010, the employee together with some other crew members were subjected to drug test and the results were positive.
 
The company issued him his termination letter and dismissed him. The employee responded to the termination letter appealing his case and sought reinstatement, but his appeal was rejected.
 
Issues:

1. Whether the employee was against the company’s policies when he tested positive for drugs?

2. Whether the employee was aware of company’s drug and alcohol policy?

3. Whether it had been serious misconduct?

4. Whether the dismissal was with just cause and excuse?

The employee contended that that his dismissal had been without just cause and excuse.

He claimed that he had not used any drugs at the material time and the collection of urine sample by the company did not comply with standard operating procedures and was therefore questionable.
 
  
Held   
  
​It was crystal clear that the Drug and Alcohol Policy of the employee’s Letter of Appointment requires the crew members including the employee to undergo random drug/alcohol test.
 
In the event the crew members were tested positive for prohibited drugs or alcohol, it shall result in immediate dismissal.
 
Having been tested positive for drugs, the misconduct of the employee was a minor misconduct. It was also clear that the employee had breached the regulation and policy of the company.
 
Dismissal was with just cause and excuse.
  
 
Tags/Keywords
drugs, dismissal, misconduct
  
/Side Banners/Membership-with-a-Click.jpg
/Side Banners/TalentCorp_170x55.jpg
/Side Banners/KWSP_170x104.jpg
/Side Banners/ace_170x153.jpg
/Side Banners/cape_170x50.jpg
/Side Banners/ioe_170x95.jpg
/Side Banners/ilo_170x90.jpg

   ©  Copyright 2024 Malaysian Employers Federation  |  All Rights Reserved.